| 
    
        
      Comparison of adequate smears against inadequate smears: 
      
        
          | Satisfactory for evaluation  | 
          Unsatisfactory for evaluation  | 
         
        
          | Appropriate labeling  | 
          Lack of patient data  | 
         
        
          | Well displayed and well preserved squamous epithelial cells covering more than 10% of the area under the cover slip.
 | 
          Scant squamous epithelial cells component : less than 10% of the slide surface  | 
         
        
          | Presence of endocervical and or
immature metaplastic cells | 
          Obscuring blood, inflammatory cells, excessive cytolysis, thick areas, poor fixation, air drying | 
         
        
          | Clinical information provided –age, menstrual status, appearance of cervix , irregular bleeding e.g. post coital or post menopausal bleeding. | 
          Contaminants  which obscure more than 50% of epithelial cells
 | 
         
       
      A SLIDE CONTAINING ABNORMAL CELLS SHOULD NEVER BE CLASSIFIED AS INADEQUATE. 
      Here are some examples of inadequate smears: Click on them to view the full picture  
      
      Quality control measures to reduce the risk of false negative smears  
      
        - Random re-screening: This method is widely used in the United States. It involves supervisory staff re-screening 10%
of all smears classified as negative or inadequate by the primary screener. The whole slide should be examined allowing approximately 6 minutes per smear. Although the chances of  detecting error are small, this approach increases awareness of risk of error.
 
        - Rapid re-screening: This method is widely used in the UK. It involves supervisory staff performing a partial review of every slide classified as negative or inadequate by the primary screener. The slide is reviewed for 1 minute at  low magnification (x10 objective)
A record of the relative sensitivity of primary screening should be kept using the following formula:
 
       
      
        
          |   | 
          Abnormal smears correctly identified by the screener 
            _______________________________________ 
            total abnormal smears after rapid review x 100  | 
            | 
         
       
        
      
        
            | 
         
        
          | Flow chart to show quality control check of negative and inadequate smears after primary screening. | 
         
       
      Internal quality control procedures which should be applied periodically 
      
        - Peer review and regular  discussion of abnormal smears
 
        - Comparison of biopsy with cytology
 
        - Review  smear history  of women with  invasive cancer for possible false negative smear reports
Slides should be stored for up to 10 years for  this purpose
 
        - Check on Workload and Monitoring turnaround time.
 
        - Statistical  monitoring of laboratory performance at regional or national level.
 
         
       
       » Inadequate smears 
         
            |